...deprive them of liberties? Did they have evidence? A lot of people blamed the government, right? I forgot who spearheaded the idea about it being the King's blame..
Sorry, i meant the American colonists!
Which colonists? Which king? When? Need more details to be able to answer.
Edit:
I think its part of human nature to feel deliberately persecuted when the problem is often neglect or indifference. The government was in a bad financial state due to poor trade and a general Economic slump, so kept raising taxes. This is a state of affairs that no citizen wants to be in.
In Britain, people could grumble and the authorities knew there were limits as to how far they could be pushed. However, in the colonies, the people had little means of feedback to any authority that could change things, as that was on the other side of the Atlantic.
The authorities hadn't quite changed their mindset from when France was still a major threat to British possessions in North America; then the colonists had been accepting of whatever was imposed in return for protection, as the alternative could have been to lose everything. However, since the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, that had changed. There was a new confidence in the colonies and new expectations that went with it.
The colonists saw increased taxes and no benefit in return. There was no real danger militarily, and they were still not getting any representation. Officials sent out from Britain were often there because of their connections, not because of ability, so mismanagement caused annoyance.
As the colonists agitated against this, the government reacted by shutting down their voices; closing assemblies and arresting individuals. This just provoked more anger, and before long an increased military presence was in their midst restricting their own actions despite the lack of external enemies.
They had gone from optimistic but facing some problems, to being very hard put-upon. Of course they blamed the government who had ordered these taxes and restrictions, and felt they were being targetted. The government didn't want them to to have liberties, they reasoned, so they were being deliberately deprived. It was all a parliamentary conspiracy.
Of course the government had no particular aim to remove any liberties per se, they just wanted the extra revenue and an orderly set of colonies. They didn't realise that these two were mutually exclusive, as they had no real empathy for the colonists. There were a good number of British officials on the ground who did have empathy and saw what was happening, but they had no more ability to change minds in London than the colonists themselves.
The disgruntlement and conspiracy theories gathered pace, a psychological threshold was reached and certain people began to plot a major change to this state of affairs. The rest is history...
The colonies were struggling economically, as was Great Britain. To raise revenue, Parliament kept imposing new taxes on the colonies without any consultation. Colonists felt imposed upon and protested, but didn't even receive a response. As unrest grew, the colonial assemblies were disbanded, those arrested were shipped to England for trial, the British army and navy were sent to America and British soldiers were quartered in colonial homes at the colonists' expense. I think most people would see that as a plan to deprive them of their liberties. In fact, though, most colonists believed that evil bureaucrats were behind it all and hoped the king would save them. They came only reluctantly to believe that he didn't care.