In Luke 13:32 Jesus noted he was not perfected,
but also that he'd be perfected on the third day.
We know Jesus wasn't perfected yet when resurrected,
for when resurrected Jesus still had a flaw: John 20:27,
and when resurrected Jesus still upbraided: Mark 16:14.
We also know Jesus wasn't perfected when ascended,
for when lastly ascended he still had enemies (enmity).
Having enemies, even if to love instead of to hate,
is like having jeopardy every hour, isn't harmless.
So even as a new high priest, he isn't harmless.
(Eg: RCC priests are high, but still not harmless)
So Hebrews 6 talks of leaving doctrinal flaws
to go on unto perfection, which has no f-laws;
And Hebrews 7 talks of high priest going higher,
and notably to become harmless, not harmageddon.
So isn't it time we stopped talking of harmageddon,
(if talk of decease [law: sin: death] is not harmless)
and started talking of the Christ that is "harmless"?
but also that he'd be perfected on the third day.
We know Jesus wasn't perfected yet when resurrected,
for when resurrected Jesus still had a flaw: John 20:27,
and when resurrected Jesus still upbraided: Mark 16:14.
We also know Jesus wasn't perfected when ascended,
for when lastly ascended he still had enemies (enmity).
Having enemies, even if to love instead of to hate,
is like having jeopardy every hour, isn't harmless.
So even as a new high priest, he isn't harmless.
(Eg: RCC priests are high, but still not harmless)
So Hebrews 6 talks of leaving doctrinal flaws
to go on unto perfection, which has no f-laws;
And Hebrews 7 talks of high priest going higher,
and notably to become harmless, not harmageddon.
So isn't it time we stopped talking of harmageddon,
(if talk of decease [law: sin: death] is not harmless)
and started talking of the Christ that is "harmless"?
