studstrickle
New member
- Jul 4, 2008
- 19
- 0
- 1
I've just read this story, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/7950500.stm
The judge say's he's taken into account several things, the guys age, first time offender and his guilty plea.
Do you think the scumbags age had more to do with the sentence handed down to him.
8 years seems hardly justified, if he was younger do you think he'd have gotten a longer sentence?
The judge say's he's taken into account several things, the guys age, first time offender and his guilty plea.
Do you think the scumbags age had more to do with the sentence handed down to him.
8 years seems hardly justified, if he was younger do you think he'd have gotten a longer sentence?