Why many blacks argue "Our skin can be black, but our blood is red too!"? But,
rats have red blood too!? I'm not understand the logic this argument when some orators speaks about racial equality. Mosquitoes, fliers, ect have a red blood. Then some bugs have right to quotas too {soft Irony}?
This is a sophism, or be, a weak logic?
Other argument: "Our [blacks] helped to build this country". But it was partially valid only in south of US where had enslavement, alright? Inasmuch, in the north, the enslavement was rare (in the maximum had black women maid servants), But instead there were the white servants paid or was himself settler who worked on his land. And even in the south wasn't blacks that made a draft of houses, buildings, ect of landlords, because in black Africa (of where the slaves came), had not elaborated buildings, but huts - except, perhaps, in muslim Africa.
Note: It is a historical doubt that still hasn't good explanation.
rats have red blood too!? I'm not understand the logic this argument when some orators speaks about racial equality. Mosquitoes, fliers, ect have a red blood. Then some bugs have right to quotas too {soft Irony}?
This is a sophism, or be, a weak logic?
Other argument: "Our [blacks] helped to build this country". But it was partially valid only in south of US where had enslavement, alright? Inasmuch, in the north, the enslavement was rare (in the maximum had black women maid servants), But instead there were the white servants paid or was himself settler who worked on his land. And even in the south wasn't blacks that made a draft of houses, buildings, ect of landlords, because in black Africa (of where the slaves came), had not elaborated buildings, but huts - except, perhaps, in muslim Africa.
Note: It is a historical doubt that still hasn't good explanation.