the hundred that died so that the thousand may live idea was perhaps what he had in mind? So someone who is a pro lifer should be judged more harshly than one who is pro choice who is a murderer?
You judge by your rules and I'll judge by mine. Just so happens my rules are rather close to what the law is.
As for the abortion doctor who killed those who ended up being born and surviving then he deserved to be tried for murder.
It's just a shame that the pro-lifers hate America so much that they feel they have the right to ignore our laws and kill Doctors providing a service to their community.
Actually he didn't and he wasn't - but thanks or contributing another rhetoric driven opinion with no basis in fact.
Here's a question - how much of Crowley have you read? Ill hazard a guess at....zero. Now this does lead one to wonder where your - and SiB - get your opinion from. I'm tempted to say "out your ass" but given that you are both Christians in some way shape or form its safer to say you have taken a "party line" without actually looking into it
How does being a recreational drug user make him a heroin junkie?
Your lack or research on the things you post is very disturbing. Or, is it as Hannibal suggested and you are just parroting what you have heard from others?
Well clearly you have put a lot of thought into this...
You do realist he WASN'T actually an addict at the end of his life don't you? Crowley was actually more of a Libertarian than anything else. But why let the facts get in the way eh?
CG has consistently displayed a dogmatic approach to everything she has an opinion on - except TV and films - and never let's reality intrude on that so why would her "opinion" (in parenthesis because they usually come from a preponderance of evidence rather than verbatim regurgitation of nonsense) on Crowley be any different?
One wonders if she harbours the same feeling for WB Yeats?
He became addicted to opiates after receiving morphine for medical reasons. It's easily done.
He also got clean for a long time - not so easily done.
Like I said, if you achieve half of what he did, you'll have done very well indeed. Of course, that's unlikely, because if you refuse to study the writings of anyone who ever made a mistake or showed human weakness in any of it's myriad forms, you're going to find your reading material quite limited.
Oh yeah he really accomplished something. I'm just green with envy over a failed magician, a crude vulgar man who defecated in public and a social reject like Crowley.
"See these books? I wrote them all. But they don't call me Aleister the Writer. See these mountains? I climbed them all. But they don't call me Aleister the Mountain Climber. Defecate in public once and you'll always be known as Aleister Dirty Breeches."
Why do you even care if we are talking about him? It's obvious you have nothing to add.
I am interested in what Hannibal may choose to say about him as he is an unknown for the most part to me. I do enjoy the writings of Anton LeVay though.