Are cc's a good indicator of what bike is for beginners or not?

Sayf

New member
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Points
1
I have ridden scooters for years, 150cc and up. I am 6'1 and 210 pounds. I want to upgrade to motorcycles and I am wondering what all the hype is about cc's and a death wish. #1 I could give a F@#$ less about racing or exceeding speed limits. I do care about longevity and the ability for my bike to go long distances ( though I am not a tour fan). I like the Honda Hornet and am wondering if it is too large of bike for a mature and responsible beginner or not. Let me know some of your insight and recommendations. I hear all of these people talk about buying a 250 and upgrading a year later , but the reality is I cannot buy a new bike a year from now . So Fu@# off you spoiled brats, I need a bike that will be good fro a few years to come and one that I can purchase used now.
 
no.

A 600cc sport bike far out performs a 883cc v-twin.

Number of cylinders is a better indicator than ccs.
So is riding position,number of brakes (3 or 2), redline RPMs
 
If you have ridden "scooters for years, 150cc and up" I would not consider you to be a beginner. You probably know what you are doing. A 600cc Hornet sounds pretty reasonable.
 
New bikes are for rubes. Getting a killer deal on a used bike is half the fun.

You really have to go bike by bike with it comes to suitability for a beginner. The hornet is way too much bike for a beginner. Almost 100hp.

Check out bestbeginnermotorcycles.com
 
Back
Top