I could make a formidable argument if I could prove that Jesus did not exist.
However, I think it rather foolish to deny the existence of one of the most influential personalities in this world's history. So, that being said, a person that argues with Scripture can't prove otherwise. If Jesus lived (agreeing with historians, both friendly and hostile) then the Scripture is most likely correct about the empty tomb. What happened to the body of a executed criminal under the guard of roman centurions whose purpose was to secure the tomb at the cost of their own lives? Think critically about this and there is only one logical answer. The argument of the empty tomb is too compelling to dismiss without seriously considering the resurrection. It is far easier to say that Jesus was never there because he did not exist; but that is the epitome of ignorance.
The bible cannot be proven wrong but that doesn't necessarily mean that people are going to believe it. Hebrews 4:12 makes it clear that God's word determines unbelief. From our birth, because of our sin nature, there are layers and layers of deception that we've aquired from life. We believe what we want to believe. And God's word, being sharper than a two-edged sword, cuts through these layers of deceptions and illuminates the darkness with its glorious revealing ligth and shows, not only what is right or wrong with our hearts, but what we truly believe. It discerns the motivatons behind our thoughts and intentions.
http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/Historical%20evidence%20on%20the%20exhistance%20of%20Jesus.htm
This is quick link to some of the facts. Still, the most compelling evidence, taken with these historical documents, is the fact that hundreds of Jesus' followers in the first century AD gave their lives for their faith. You really have to be blind to deny that Jesus existed.