...flavored tobacco illegal? First, Obama makes flavored tobacco illegal because he thinks its bad for you to smoke.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/22/obama-anti-smoking-legislation-fda
Then, he makes marijuana available for medical use. I thought he just signed a bill to make flavored cigarettes illegal, now we can do drugs so we don't "freak out, maaaan"?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091020/ap_on_re_us/us_medical_marijuana
So, what your saying is, its better to use pot as a medication than sticking to your morals and finding an alternative?
I'm still pretty sure weed isn't the only solution. We have pills that can do the same thing (if not, we CAN make them) with less side effects (like no lung cancer, for starters)
so saying "smoking's bad" then making weed into a medicine doesn't contradict anything? What if it was "we're only selling American cars in America, but all the profit goes to Asia"? It defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/22/obama-anti-smoking-legislation-fda
Then, he makes marijuana available for medical use. I thought he just signed a bill to make flavored cigarettes illegal, now we can do drugs so we don't "freak out, maaaan"?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091020/ap_on_re_us/us_medical_marijuana
So, what your saying is, its better to use pot as a medication than sticking to your morals and finding an alternative?
I'm still pretty sure weed isn't the only solution. We have pills that can do the same thing (if not, we CAN make them) with less side effects (like no lung cancer, for starters)
so saying "smoking's bad" then making weed into a medicine doesn't contradict anything? What if it was "we're only selling American cars in America, but all the profit goes to Asia"? It defeats the purpose, doesn't it?