...or will future Popes ban it? I was flabbergasted when Pope Paul VI [sic] banned the Ancient Mass of the Church in 1969. I believe the church-legal term is "suppressed."
Do you know how the New Mass (Novos Ordo) came about? Paul VI turned over "reforming" the Mass to Annibale Bugnini [sic] of unhappy memory, who set up a group of nonCatholic Jews and Protestants and instructed them to delete everything from the Mass that offends them.
My God!
It is no coincidence that the steep decline in Mass attendance and in religious vocations corresponded perfectly with the time of Vatican Council 2 and the banning of the Latin Mass in the 1960s.
Now, I know that the gates of hell will never prevail against the Church, but the Devil and his modernist minions have for sure stirred up a lot of trouble for Holy Mother Church, lo these past few decades.
What do you think?
This is an "in-house" question to concerned Catholics, so do not leave any "don't care" messages. We already know that they who do not care, do not care.
And no wise-crackers. This is a subject dear to the hearts of obedient Catholics worldwide, who have been forced to put up with abominations like "liturgical dance", obviously gay men participating in the Mass, new church buildings that look like gymnasiums and every other innovation straight from the pit of you-know-where.