RayBalthazar
New member
Suppose your in a room full of blind atheists who do not believe red exist, because they can't see it? And all they can say is, prove red exists, we can't see it can you prove it?
If you can't prove it, then red does not exist!
Does this logic not fail on every level? Just because red can't be seen by a blind person, does that default to red not existing because it can't proven to the satisfaction of the blind?
Atheism is non-belief which leaves no place for doubt, it is not a non-belief; it is a superstition by definition: a non-belief or notion, not based on reason or knowledge or circumstance not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome.
If you can't prove it, then red does not exist!
Does this logic not fail on every level? Just because red can't be seen by a blind person, does that default to red not existing because it can't proven to the satisfaction of the blind?
Atheism is non-belief which leaves no place for doubt, it is not a non-belief; it is a superstition by definition: a non-belief or notion, not based on reason or knowledge or circumstance not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome.