I have a question about the OJ Simpson trial and evidence.?

B

BottledGenie

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2009
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Not familiar with the particulars, except that he claimed the cops put blood from the crime scene onto his shoes and socks to frame him. The shoes weren't rare, just Italian or something. If the evidence was ruled inadmissable, it didn't matter what was found. All I remember from back then was hearing the phrase "bloody socks" repeated and repeated and repeated. No one ever found his shoes did they? He gave a dufflebag [full of clothes & shoes?] to one of his friends and it was never seen again...

You'll have to search for a transcript of the trial for the gory details. Go to a lawyer's office or a law library, as they have access to trials on computer that the general public does not have.
 
Alright, I know they had the whole shoe print evidence with the rare shoes in his size. Did this help the judge at all with their decision. Did it make a difference? Did it affect the verdict? I need to know details about how this helped the case, if it did. I know this trial is somewhat old, but it is for school
i just want information about the shoe prints and if it helped at all in the case
 
Also there was the gloves. They were dried out the day he put them on in court So they didn't fit him by this time Money was what really got him out. They were called the DreamTeam I think he had three lawyers I think he though that he was going to get off this time But you cant beat the film that they had on them Good luck I hope I help u out
 
Also there was the gloves. They were dried out the day he put them on in court So they didn't fit him by this time Money was what really got him out. They were called the DreamTeam I think he had three lawyers I think he though that he was going to get off this time But you cant beat the film that they had on them Good luck I hope I help u out
 
Also there was the gloves. They were dried out the day he put them on in court So they didn't fit him by this time Money was what really got him out. They were called the DreamTeam I think he had three lawyers I think he though that he was going to get off this time But you cant beat the film that they had on them Good luck I hope I help u out
 
There was a mountain of evidence, but the defense easily proved that some of the articles were planted or at least tampered with.. Armed with that thought, the jury could not believe with any degree of certainty that more or all of the evidence was tampered with
Evidence
1. The bloody socks. did not show up on the video of the crime scene but turned up later mysteriously.
the socks were examined by both sides in June and neither side found any blood. In Aug. a reporter who was subpeoned before the judge reported that the socks now have a blood mixture of Ron, and Nicole's blood. She didnt reveal her source, but low and behold the socks were sent to be tested after her report and it came back just as she reported- ODD huh?
2. The tow truck driver who hauled away the bronco stole a sovenier from the passenger side glove box. He testified that he did not see any blood in the bronco, yet when the Bronco was photographed 2 months later, it was full of blood
3. The missing blood. Vanatter traveled around with OJs blood sample all afternoon, to both crime scenes..some was missing- the police have no idea why

There is plenty more

I know every detail of this case and know that OJ if guilty was also framed, but he could not have done this alone
 
There was a mountain of evidence, but the defense easily proved that some of the articles were planted or at least tampered with.. Armed with that thought, the jury could not believe with any degree of certainty that more or all of the evidence was tampered with
Evidence
1. The bloody socks. did not show up on the video of the crime scene but turned up later mysteriously.
the socks were examined by both sides in June and neither side found any blood. In Aug. a reporter who was subpeoned before the judge reported that the socks now have a blood mixture of Ron, and Nicole's blood. She didnt reveal her source, but low and behold the socks were sent to be tested after her report and it came back just as she reported- ODD huh?
2. The tow truck driver who hauled away the bronco stole a sovenier from the passenger side glove box. He testified that he did not see any blood in the bronco, yet when the Bronco was photographed 2 months later, it was full of blood
3. The missing blood. Vanatter traveled around with OJs blood sample all afternoon, to both crime scenes..some was missing- the police have no idea why

There is plenty more

I know every detail of this case and know that OJ if guilty was also framed, but he could not have done this alone
 
There was a mountain of evidence, but the defense easily proved that some of the articles were planted or at least tampered with.. Armed with that thought, the jury could not believe with any degree of certainty that more or all of the evidence was tampered with
Evidence
1. The bloody socks. did not show up on the video of the crime scene but turned up later mysteriously.
the socks were examined by both sides in June and neither side found any blood. In Aug. a reporter who was subpeoned before the judge reported that the socks now have a blood mixture of Ron, and Nicole's blood. She didnt reveal her source, but low and behold the socks were sent to be tested after her report and it came back just as she reported- ODD huh?
2. The tow truck driver who hauled away the bronco stole a sovenier from the passenger side glove box. He testified that he did not see any blood in the bronco, yet when the Bronco was photographed 2 months later, it was full of blood
3. The missing blood. Vanatter traveled around with OJs blood sample all afternoon, to both crime scenes..some was missing- the police have no idea why

There is plenty more

I know every detail of this case and know that OJ if guilty was also framed, but he could not have done this alone
 
Back
Top