MisterChartreuse
New member
- Sep 6, 2011
- 10
- 0
- 1
And a Hell 1000x worse than the Christian Hell, then would Pascal's wager not then obligate you to subscribe to it instead of Christianity? After all, the argument is based on avoiding risk. I have just given you more to lose/gain by inventing this religion.
(In the description of this religions Heaven and Hell, it literally just describes it as '1000x times better/worse' respectively.)
I'm not saying Pascal's wager is a good argument (actually, it is the worst one every made in the history of arguments), but would you not agree that if someone DID happen to take it seriously, they would need to subscribe to my religion?
(In the description of this religions Heaven and Hell, it literally just describes it as '1000x times better/worse' respectively.)
I'm not saying Pascal's wager is a good argument (actually, it is the worst one every made in the history of arguments), but would you not agree that if someone DID happen to take it seriously, they would need to subscribe to my religion?