If the warmists manipulate their data to show warmer trends, why does

AModestProposal

New member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Spencer's data show the most? Dr. Roy Spencer is an anthropogenic climate change skeptic. In a recent question dealing with the Daily Mail, the totally unsupported assertion that the data was manipulated upwards was suggested:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aj.3KzB8j83ZjAActGOBaMfsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20101214042623AAXdVSd

Actually, "fabricated" was the word used.

Why, then, and I pointed this out in the previous question but don't think I'll get a response, does an anthropogenic global warming SKEPTIC have a larger warming trend than the "fabricated" data from the Hadley Center and CRU?
Spencer's, 1996-2010
http://www.flickr.com/photos/56645614@N02/5260777088/
HadCRUT3v, 1996-2010
http://www.flickr.com/photos/56645614@N02/5260699144/

Is Spencer in on it too? Is this some sort of double agent deal?
(I should be fair - the assertion was not completely unsupported, as there were several references to blogs detailing alleged changes in very specific data sets, but hey, maybe if we believe hard enough, that means the HadCRU3 data set has been fabricated too.)
 
Back
Top