Is it ok to out reporters and people with no sense of humor?

L

LibertyX

New member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
http://answers.yahoo.com/activity?show=g0caC6aiaa

Reported & blocked me for answering one of her questions with "I'm afraid of your Mom" or something like that. Because she was a contact-in-law I thought she must be a cool person with a great sense of humor, my contacts are all awesome people who have a great sense of humor so I assumed their contacts would be as well.

I couldn't have been more wrong!

She sent me a nasty email about how my answer was disrespectful and offensive. I didn't think it was all that bad myself but, giving her the benefit of a doubt as she was a contact of a contact and realizing that perhaps she might be under some sort of stress of which I may not be aware, I attempted to answer her email and apologize only to find she had blocked me. (The act of a true tightasss coward-send a nasty email and block before the other person can respond.) Then I got the VN email which means she is also a tattle-tale in addition to being an idiot and a coward and having the sense of humor of a flattened pine cone.

She reported me, that makes her a tattle-tale and a coward.

I calls 'em like I sees 'em though I also realize I don't know everything and I have been wrong before. If anyone can shed some light on her behavior I inviite them to do so and I will absolutely listen with an open mind. However she will remain a jerk and a snitch in my book until she proves herself otherwise. I don't care if she ever unblocks me or not, but removing the snarky remarks on her profile would be nice. Again, getting your licks in while out of reach of the person you are attacking for no real reason is a cowardly and douchey thing to do.

But, whatever. My main point here is to out a known reporter.

You're welcome :)
I appreciate your honesty Fred and have just blocked your tattling asss. Thanks!
 
Out away; that behavior typifies the personality of the kind of hall monitor hypocrite who wants to own and regulate other people.
 
There's nothing wrong with a bit of name and shame luv.
If reporters and tittle tats want to cause grief with their nastiness and lack of humour then they should be prepared to cop a bit back when they get found out.
Tit for tat I say.
 
Well, her last move was kinda poultry-poop--like making a prank call before caller id and hanging up real fast...still, she might be some kind of semi-fragile shrinking violet (on P&S?) Of course, Robin Williams on ecstasy and Redbull would be a shrinking violet compared to you.


EDIT:
I HAVE reported before, but only spammers like that Nike crap and a couple porn avatars (we have delinquent children sneaking on here, for gosh sakes) There. That's a load off.
*GETS HORRENDOUSLY BLOCKED*
 
I'd rather know who the reporters are so I can steer well clear of them and I think everyone who are our contacts would probably agree.

Far too many Q's and A's go reported for the smallest of things, it's ridiculous. It ruffles my feathers to no end when someone is on the attack and then shuts down so you can't respond. At least give the other person time to answer, it's only fair and just. Right?

Yahoo isn't the same place it used to be and it's getting on my t!ts.
 
Back
Top