Is it perplexing that people complain about City spending tons of money?

Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
But then are OK with teams in the CL parking the bus because they need to win to get money so they can spend it?
@ frosty: Inter aren't the only who use their bus on the field...
@ siRyan: This question was not aimed at you unless you support parking the bus tactics....

@ Captain: Fair enough and yes Sergio made a meal of that foul but was he hit on the face? Yes and normally and specially in the CL, hands to face means yellow card. Since Motta was already on a yellow, a second one would had equal a Red... Just food for thoughts...

@ Tauro: Boring but yet you've answered it... Hmmm. Who's the idiot?
 
people are haters. they dont want to see a super team threaten all the competition.
 
ffs....I ain't annoyed at the fact they are spending loadsa money....I'm annoyed that they have been HANDED billions....and don't have to work for their status.... unlike the likes of LFC, Man Utd and Arsenal who have spent decades developing their clubs/brands through good football, class and history...


and the fact I'm from Manchester compounds my hate for them...
 
You have a point. But all these questions about parking buses makes me think your still bitter about inter beating barca over 2 legs last season....
 
Maybe if Barcelona had not cheated to get the Inter player sent off they wouldn't have had to park the bus
 
@ Ryan: You are being a hypocrite. United did spend to get to where they are now. When premiership started it was all United setting records in transfers and only matched by Blackburn , who eventually did win the league.That din't stop united who spent even more and eventually dominated premier league.Thanks to Wenger he stopped the trend for a while and now Chelsea.

edit: 7 titles between 1900 - 1970 ?

Why 3 td's for speaking the truth :| bitter united fans

Edit: Let me correct you

7 league titles from 1907 to 1967

and 6 FA cup from 108 to 1985

and premiership started in 1992

Edit: No , I am saying United use the excuse that they won 7 titles way back in 1970 as an excuse to spend in 1990's to win leagues.

You need to invest in top players to challenge for titles and you don't need history to spend.

Edit: So you saying City have won nothing since 1900 ?
So should all Arsenal fans ridicule United for buying of their league titles since 1992 when we won our 13 league titles without any big time investment ?

Edit: So why is the article troubling united fans ? Why din't the arabs choose United then ? for the huge fan base they have ( which only grew since United spent money during the early premiership seasons )

Edit: So you are saying they invested in United because they won 7 league titles until 1970's ? come on mate then Arsenal fans should be grumbling for not investing in us as we had more league titles

Edit 5 td's !!
 
Cant they donate some money to the poor people in africa instead of wasting 27m on ballotelli
 
Mostly United fans complain about that and we all know why
 
Your questions are more boring than the park-the-bus tactic.
 
Actually, they are a good example of how to spend money dumbly.

I'm not offended though. It's actually kind of amusing, they are so silly in how they blow money.
 
Back
Top