Kempo vs shotokan which is a better striking martial art?

G

GiovanniFernandez

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Dont tell me crap, "THere is no better martial art" cut the crap. Who will win if the have the same size, muscle and experience in their respective art.
Kokoro piece of shit shut the fuck up. All this crap that there are no best martial arts shove that up ur ass damn fool. There are better arts fool
Ed parker kempo karate vs shotokan. Wtf ur saying shotokan is not a striking martial art what a fool!
 
The more power a person has makes the difference, not the style. I have been doing kempo for 7 yrs and it is a great style of martial arts. From what I know, the two styles are similar consisting of basics, kata, and sparring. The only way to determine the outcome of the fight is to actually have it happen.
 
the better fighter, its the person not the style that makes the difference.

just because your too dumb to understand there is no best doesn't make it any less valid, if you dont want to hear the truth then dont ask the question.

edit:> john doe, both shotokan and kempo have grappling and striking , stand up and ground. but children like you are just too one dimensional in your training
 
Hey guess what! There is not better art, and if you had enough evidence to prove otherwise YOU WOULDN'T BE ASKING US NOW WOULD YOU. Welcome to the real world. Now grow up, learn to express yourself without the need of swearing, and actually take a good look at what your saying. How can you ever say one is better than the other? No amount of tests can prove anything, it's a fight anything can happen. Once your in the ring, it's not as though the arts come out and start fighting for you. This like asking whether a glock or beretta is better. It doesn't matter what the gun is if you can't aim well.
 
Back
Top