Need to painlessly poison and kill my neighbor's dogs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hue L
  • Start date Start date

6CXlAZ

  • tMYYLDrJKiKyros

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • nQvMhdps

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
you psychopathic bastards ! go fuck yourself with justin bieber ! taking a dog's like is fucking crime and you can be fucked up hard for that u blatherring idiot ! ill jus call your neighbour and tell him what are you thinking to do and then booom he will put a burning rod right into ur ass u bloody ass whiping dog hater ! get a life u bastard !

YOU! I HOPE YOU HAVE AIDS IN YOUR FACE!

It would be funny if people weren't suffering - here we have examples of the retarded morons who think (and I use the term loosely) that anyone who kills a stupid animal to protect their privacy or even their safety has no right to do so.

It does grieve me that the dog ends up being the victim. Honestly. I know from personal experience that a 24/7 yapping dog would drive a saint to the point that he's want to make the thing die a slow and painful death. The fact is though that the dog is blameless because it is an animal that gets through life sleeping, shitting, eating and of course barking. In an ideal world the owner of a nuisance dog would get 2 warnings and be shot, then the dog would be taken away to be trained and given to a decent owner who cares for both the dog and his neighbours.

It's interesting that this thread has run for 5 years and not one person has come up with a cogent argument as to why someone who's desperate should not poison a dumb, organic noisebox in order to get the quiet to which they are entitled. Nobody will; because there is no argument against it. End of story.
 
u fucking stupd pscyhos u wanna kill dogs their lovely i hope u all get cancer i have and some1 tried 2 poison her if i find them il'l kill em

Only kidding - just found this site and it seems that posters are divided into genuinely decent people at the end of their tether and idiotic twats who post the rubbish I've written above. Aids in your face? Come on...

I like the idea of household goods that aren't obvious poisons. I've got a problem dog and I need to kill it but I agree with the post a few pages back that shoving rat poison over the fence is just asking for trouble. I'm hoping a mixture of macadamia nuts, raisins and chocolate will stop the stupid neighbour's dog trying to kill my cat, shitting everywhere and generally being a waste of space.

The sponge idea also sounds good but I'm not sure how to get the dog to eat it.
 
dontkilldogsyouf*ckwits

Dont kill your neighbors dog you piece of sh1t, its not their fault its the owners fault for the way they bring up their dogs. If you have an issue with them why dont you man up and confront the owner instead of being a pathetic coward loser and taking it out on the dogs. If you do attempt to kill the dogs I can only hope the owner catches you out and does to you what I would do to you if I caught you trying to poison my dog.
 
Dont kill your neighbors dog you piece of sh1t, its not their fault its the owners fault for the way they bring up their dogs. If you have an issue with them why dont you man up and confront the owner instead of being a pathetic coward loser and taking it out on the dogs. If you do attempt to kill the dogs I can only hope the owner catches you out and does to you what I would do to you if I caught you trying to poison my dog.

Confronting the owners does no good. The owner doesn't care. If they did, they wouldn't let their dogs bark.

Is that simple enough for you, you retard?
 
So it's slow? Even better! Noisy dogs deserve a slow death.

Too right! Anyone who's suffered the hell of a neighbor's dog's constant barking will understand this. Even if you liked dogs before, you get to the point where you'd quite happily spend hours, no DAYS, torturing that damn dog slowly to death.

The slower and more painfully the dog dies, the better.
 
Nothing upsets dog owners more than complaining about their beloved slobbering mutts, as said earlier they take it personally, get in a huff and indignantly refuse to do anything about it.

On the other hand you have the poor guy making the complaint who has had to endure the noise for months on end with broken or very little sleep and is desperate for a solution.

Kill em all I say.
 
This guy seems mad.

Delicious

(in reference to "YOU! I HOPE YOU HAVE AIDS IN YOUR FACE!")

Yes, there are some nutters out there and there's a guilty pleasure in having a laugh at people who function (sort of) normally but behave like retards.

Thing is though that people like this typify the kind of dog owner who inspires threads like this. Unlike previous contributors I wouldn't want to cause the dog unnecessary suffering; after all, the dog is just a stupid animal and can't help what it does. On the other hand if poor old Muggins in his quest for a quiet and normal life finds a way to eliminate the problem I can't say that I'm too worried if it's humane or not. The most important thing is not to get caught because anyone who hasn't been through the hell of a barking neighbour's dog won't understand.

Tip of the week: if you are in the situation where you need to use the suggestions on this thread, make sure you've deleted all history of visiting here before you do the deed!
 
Dont kill your neighbors dog you piece of sh1t, its not their fault its the owners fault for the way they bring up their dogs. If you have an issue with them why dont you man up and confront the owner instead of being a pathetic coward loser and taking it out on the dogs. If you do attempt to kill the dogs I can only hope the owner catches you out and does to you what I would do to you if I caught you trying to poison my dog.

YOU! I HOPE YOU HAVE AIDS IN YOUR FACE!
 
Some of you people are sick as hell! Good luck trying to pour anything down those dogs throats. I hope they rip out your throat! Some of these responses are absolutely horrifying. What the hell is wrong with people?

It works well for small dogs, which are the most annoying. Nasty little dog was yapping all the time and ruining my sleep patterns so I got hold of it one night and poured household bleach down its throat. Next day - blissful quiet. The owner suspected me and a couple of equally pissed off neighbors but she couldn't prove a thing.

So I can still bark and the dog can't. Mwahahaha!
 
If it's a little piece of shit mutt that's bothering you try and get hold of it one night and take it for a nice long drive. Someone (not me lolol) did that with an annoying dog once and drove about 300km away with it in the trunk before letting it out on the side of the road, fuckin thing was yelping and chasing the car as it drove off....it must have known what was happening haha
 
I love how dog owners trot out the excuse of "It's a guard dog hurrr!". Seriously how the fuck would you know if you have an intruder when the dog barks all the time?
 
I love how dog owners trot out the excuse of "It's a guard dog hurrr!". Seriously how the fuck would you know if you have an intruder when the dog barks all the time?

^^ THIS!

I think it's a lame excuse for leaving the dog out in all weathers, which is cruel. Also if the authorities do investigate a noise complaint, saying that it's a guard dog makes the owner look vulnerable and they are more likely to get away with disturbing the peace.

Real guard dogs only bark when there is a genuine threat.
 
If it's a little piece of shit mutt that's bothering you try and get hold of it one night and take it for a nice long drive. Someone (not me lolol) did that with an annoying dog once and drove about 300km away with it in the trunk before letting it out on the side of the road, fuckin thing was yelping and chasing the car as it drove off....it must have known what was happening haha


You could have been a little more humane and killed the dog rather than leaving it to the elements where it wouldn't survive. But I suppose that possibility didn't cross your sociopathic mind. By the way, let me know when you start killing kids?
 
It would be funny if people weren't suffering - here we have examples of the retarded morons who think (and I use the term loosely) that anyone who kills a stupid animal to protect their privacy or even their safety has no right to do so.

It does grieve me that the dog ends up being the victim. Honestly. I know from personal experience that a 24/7 yapping dog would drive a saint to the point that he's want to make the thing die a slow and painful death. The fact is though that the dog is blameless because it is an animal that gets through life sleeping, shitting, eating and of course barking. In an ideal world the owner of a nuisance dog would get 2 warnings and be shot, then the dog would be taken away to be trained and given to a decent owner who cares for both the dog and his neighbours.

It's interesting that this thread has run for 5 years and not one person has come up with a cogent argument as to why someone who's desperate should not poison a dumb, organic noisebox in order to get the quiet to which they are entitled. Nobody will; because there is no argument against it. End of story.

Because its life. Because it can feel pain. Look, if the barking is that unbearable, aren't earplugs an option? The dog isn't barking for fun, or out of spite. I mean, you have to agree that a person will do worse things to you, and intentionally do. I have cats and dogs so know what loss of wither would do to me.

Would you poison a psychologically challenged person who screamed all night long and managed to hurt your cats? No no I'm not equalising humans with animals. I'm saying, both can feel pain, right? So, wouldn't it be harsh to be the harbinger of that kind of pain?

You can just try to keep your cats in a fenced area. Or better yet, get the authorities to demand that the neighbor puts up a fence. Start a petition. Very logically, I ask you that don't you think what you are doing is a little atrocious?
 
What is wrong with us people is that we are fed up to breaking point with being denied a basic human right - quiet in our own homes. We want to get to sleep at a reasonable time, not lie in bed until 4am waiting for someone's stupid pet to condescend to be quiet for a couple of hours (if we're lucky). We want to be able to enjoy our time at home without constant jarring, unpleasant and stressful sound intrusion from the dog next door. We simply want to get out lives back.

If the law in most countries was as ready to deal with this invasion of privacy as it is to deal with minor motoring offences and people having a crafty ciggie in an empty public building, nobody would think about harming the dogs in question. But it isn't so we do.

Imagine this scenario: some equipment is left on a building site in a residential area - equipment which lets out a series of random, loud noises at all times of day and night. Complaints to the authorities get nowhere. How long would it be before someone found a way to disable the equipment? Not long, I'd say. That would be vandalism and therefore a crime, but who could blame the residents for doing it?

It is just the same with a dog. If a dog is all that stands between someone exchanging a miserable life for a normal one, the dog has to go. Ideally this would be a matter of the dog being kept inside or, in the last resort, removed by the authorities. But this does not happen, so sooner or later someone is going to do the only thing they can - eliminate the dog themselves. It's illegal and immoral but it's the only thing they can do, just as stealing a bite to eat from a shop may be the only action available to someone who has no money and is starving. Neither action is right but both are understandable.

I agree with you on one point - some of the suggestions on here are somewhat extreme and in some cases impractical, such as the one you mention. That said, if someone's been driven to the point of madness for months or even years by a dog robbing them of their basic human rights, it's hardly surprising that they will come to hate that dog, and won't care how much it suffers as long as they can get their peace and quiet back. We don't think that way when the source of the noise is human, e.g. a screaming child, however annoying the noise is simply BECAUSE we are dealing with a human being. A dog is NOT human, so when it pushes us to the limit we come to see it as nothing more than a noisy machine, even if we generally like dogs, but with one difference - the dog chooses to bark, the machine has no choice whether it makes a noise or not. So we will eventually feel such rage and hatred towards it that we use whatever method we can - however cruel - to shut it down. If that's sick, so be it - the sickness could have been prevented by the owner training the dog properly in the first place. Instead of which, the stupid, lazy owner's selfishness has created a number of victims: him/herself, when some "gets at" the dog; the unfortunate neighbour who has had to put up with the noise, and of course the poor dog itself.

Dogs don't bark for fun. They are either hungry, thirsty or are cold, uncomfortable. Either way, its some fault of the owner. So it wouldn't be right to punish the dog. Don't you think you could get your other neighbors to sign some sort of petition or something to get the dog's owner to take better responsibility?
 
Because its life. Because it can feel pain. Look, if the barking is that unbearable, aren't earplugs an option? The dog isn't barking for fun, or out of spite. I mean, you have to agree that a person will do worse things to you, and intentionally do. I have cats and dogs so know what loss of wither would do to me.

Would you poison a psychologically challenged person who screamed all night long and managed to hurt your cats? No no I'm not equalising humans with animals. I'm saying, both can feel pain, right? So, wouldn't it be harsh to be the harbinger of that kind of pain?

You can just try to keep your cats in a fenced area. Or better yet, get the authorities to demand that the neighbor puts up a fence. Start a petition. Very logically, I ask you that don't you think what you are doing is a little atrocious?

Why on earth someone be reduced to wearing earplugs in their own home? It's OK once in a while if there's a one-off late night party going on next door, but all day and every night? Apart from the practical considerations, such as not hearing the phone or the alarm clock, there are medical implications; there is evidence that overuse of earplugs can damage the ears. Not to mention the absurdity of someone having to take these measures on account of a neighbour's selfishness. This reply is typical among the "it's a dog, dogs bark, get over it" brigade and it is a shame you adopt it because you have put the "anti" argument forward in a courteous and thoughtful way, unlike almost all of the other negative responses which rely on threats and abuse.

Your idea of a petition MAY work in some cases, but read the stories on this thread and you will see that many selfish dog owners ignore requests for peace, whether presented verbally or in writing. In some localities it is a brave person who stands up to the problem neighbour, and although other neighbours may be equally affected they refuse even to sign a petition for fear of retaliation or getting on the wrong side of the problem neighbour.

You are wrong that killing a dog is a little bit atrocious - it is much worse than that. The fact is though that many people affected by a neighbour's dog soon run out of legal and moral options; this is particularly sad when someone has worked hard to buy the best home they can afford and then are not able to enjoy it. That is when desperation takes over and someone will try to kill the dog, usually against their better nature. I came damn close myself last year (that's how I found this thread) but fortunately the dog suddenly stopped barking of its own accord. It's still alive and I see it from time to time - I am very lucky and don't I know it. Many are not so fortunate and that is why they resort to desperate measures.

I'm not saying it's right - my point is that having been through barking hell myself I can easily understand why people are driven to such extremes. I don't expect you to agree - indeed I don't expect anyone to agree unless they've been through it themselves.
 
You could have been a little more humane and killed the dog rather than leaving it to the elements where it wouldn't survive. But I suppose that possibility didn't cross your sociopathic mind. By the way, let me know when you start killing kids?

WTF? You accuse this guy of being a sociopath and a future child killer because he DIDN'T kill the dog? At least he gave the damn thing some sort of a chance. It's unbelievable!
 
Back
Top