Poll: Do you believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories?

C

ConspiracyBuster

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Even though there is no real evidence that has not been fabricated or misinterpreted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy4hm2mKCGM
That is the kind of fabricated misinterpreted evidence i was talking about. Watch the video and learn about what kind of "experts" you have in your group.
I am not going to watch a video made by a known conspiracy theorist. Mainly because it is bias.
Therefore it has no real facts.
.....and the idiots come out.....
sheila- it looked nothing like a controllED demolition. Tell me where are the blasting caps, det cord and residue. There was not any found in the wreckage. Cleanup was bucket by bucket and lasted 9 months.
shelia- i have educated myself. That is why i do not believe in thermate or controlled demolition.
shelia- What are you 12? Learn to do some research then apply it before you spout garbage.
 
No the science of NIST is accurate and non political that explains the events
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
while the alternatives offered by sites as aetruth and sholars for 911truth are clearly crank science of failed people outside their field of expertise.

AE911Truth.INFO is dedicated to exposing the lies and mistakes of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They claim to be an advocacy group for engineers and architects questioning the "official story" of the 9/11 attacks, but it's really just putting up a front for PR purposes. They pretend to be spreading real and valuable information, but their website and presentations are filled with misinformation and lies.
http://www.ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php

Someone refers to loose change whose maker now says the movie definitely contains errors, still does contain some dubious claims and does come to some conclusions that are not backed up by the facts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUFTV6sjEdo
That's what the guy says who made this shameful piece of disinfo yet "truthers" still refer to it as a source of information exposing their lack of knowledge or any critical thiking capability.
 
Back
Top