The Bible states that God created the Earth 6,000 years ago whilst scientists discovered that the Earth was created 4.5 billion years ago (The universe is 13 billion years old). Now that, faithful readers, was researched whereas the information read in the Bible wasn't.
Let us all understand as well that the Bible is nothing more than the "greatest book of all time". It is the most fabricated work of fiction known to man. The book is actually a book full of stories that authors would send in for it to be a part of the Bible. The Bible was edited. Did you know there were "books" that did not make the bible, scriptures that were exalted from the bible? This, if it is the word of God, has been proven to be an edited version. Who are we to edit the holy word? Sure, Jesus really could have been a miracle worker, but did I forget to mention that the authors had to write the most imaginative story known to man? We will never know the actual truth because of the fallacies that ended up in the Bible && how the stories in it were passed down through generations && generations (over 1,500 years to be exact) so the "work" of Jesus is merely a fable just like Paul Bunyan && his loyal ox.
An example of one of those tales would be that of Noah's ark. Please refrain from using the Bible as historical context when you are going to start responding to this. Are you telling me that you would actually believe a book that says a man carried with him on board his boat 6,000 species of reptiles, 9,000 species of birds, and 15,000 species of mammals? This does not include a million species of insects and the additional million yet to be discovered!
How could a single vessel contain every single land borne creature on the planet? Think of the sheer number of species, then think of their respective climates of origin, dietary requirements (like eating the other animals on board or having an almost infinitely large supply of equally as many diverse plants). Then imagine how you would dispose of all that waste they produce. What about the mobility for the animals as well? Where does that come into play on a wooden boat?
Furthermore, the Egyptians AND the Chinese existed before and after the so called "flood". Why did they not drown? Didn't they notice they were submerged for 40 days and nights? Why do they not have records of a worldwide flood?
Noah's flood was plagiarized from a Mesopotamian flood a thousand years before. Get over it. No, if a Noah's flood (global flood) ever occurred, several things would be evident:
1- A globally homogenous layer of sediments would be found containing a mix of human and dinosaur bones.
2- Nobody would have survived except Noah's clan, as per scripture. (Yet the Chinese and Egyptians are still here).
3- The bio-diversity of the plant kingdom would have been limited to seaweed and mangroves.
Seeds floating or submerged in saltwater die before the 40 day mark. Land plants cannot survive coming into contact with saltwater for long periods. Atmospheric pressures on submerged plants would crush plant cellular structure. With the Earth full of dead plants and mud, what did all the animals eat after the flood?
Incase you may ask, "Well, why do you think those cultures existed before the flood?", I would have to tell you that it's common knowledge that The ancient Egyptian culture is known to date back to AT LEAST 3150 BC. That would be 5,157 ago. Most theologians agree that Noah's flood must have occurred 2349 BC. That would be 4,356 years ago. The Chinese cultures have been dated quite older than even the Egyptians.