I have a 1997 Ford Thunderbird that has only had one previous owner. I bought it for $2200 and besides a little rusted paint from sitting in my aunts driveway in the texas heat all summer and old lining on the windows, its a really good car. When I bought it it only had 82,000 miles on it and now has about 86,000.
My father owes my mother a lot of back child support and she will be getting a large sum of money in September and has agreed to give me $2000 of it. By then I will have my car completely paid off.
I am planning to move to California after Christmas and am worried that my car couldn't handle the drive to California from Texas/wouldn't be reliable once I'm there. I was considering selling my car for $2000 and taking the $2000 my mother is giving me and getting a newer car. The problem is that all the cars I've looked at in that price range look better cosmetically but have a lot more miles.
Would my car that has never had problems and has low miles hold up better, or should I opt for a newer car with more miles?
My father owes my mother a lot of back child support and she will be getting a large sum of money in September and has agreed to give me $2000 of it. By then I will have my car completely paid off.
I am planning to move to California after Christmas and am worried that my car couldn't handle the drive to California from Texas/wouldn't be reliable once I'm there. I was considering selling my car for $2000 and taking the $2000 my mother is giving me and getting a newer car. The problem is that all the cars I've looked at in that price range look better cosmetically but have a lot more miles.
Would my car that has never had problems and has low miles hold up better, or should I opt for a newer car with more miles?