heyheyitskk
New member
I understand that Israel is forcibly displacing Palestinians and taking the land. But to me the focus should then be on getting them to stop. I appreciate the history is important in that its the justification being used by the zionist elements in Israel if i've understood zionism right?
But, even with that in mind I still don't get why the history becomes the main focus point. It doesn't matter who has a more historic "right" to the land because, I'm assuming, there's no way to make either side leave short of killing them all. You can't just displace an entire population and dump them somewhere else. Fairly sure that's a really basic interpretation of Israel's formation in the first place?
If I'm right and neither side can be plucked up and dumped in another country on a whim then Israel's reclaiming law becomes a problem on that basis alone. Whether they're right that their ancestors owned the land or not is irrelevant.
This feels like a more complex, national version of reperations.
But, even with that in mind I still don't get why the history becomes the main focus point. It doesn't matter who has a more historic "right" to the land because, I'm assuming, there's no way to make either side leave short of killing them all. You can't just displace an entire population and dump them somewhere else. Fairly sure that's a really basic interpretation of Israel's formation in the first place?
If I'm right and neither side can be plucked up and dumped in another country on a whim then Israel's reclaiming law becomes a problem on that basis alone. Whether they're right that their ancestors owned the land or not is irrelevant.
This feels like a more complex, national version of reperations.