When will Conservatives learn not to argue with Liberals?

[Docker]

Liberals lower IQ only allows them to post fairy tails and lies, arguing with them is like arguing with a 2nd grader, pointless.

To prove my point some Liberals will say in response to this question " Wheres the proof, link, something " When a simple internet search would provide them with the proof but their incapable of preforming such simple task so they will post insults and further lies attempting to sound intelligent which makes for a good laugh by the way.

But let me guess their lower IQ is Bush's fault also right?
See look at the 1st Liberal that answered, proves my point. TY Cookie

 

[aaeryn53]

liberals have some of the lowest iq's ever recorded in their mothers basements in history

 

[john]

Never. They wont learn from their mistakes.

 

[MatthewB1]

this isn't a legitimate question, this is just hate speech and bull. btw, i am a social liberal and financial conservative, and have many conservative friends. you make conservatives look bad. shame on you.

 

[YodaCookieMonster]

I notice you have no link to support your hate speech. funny.

 

[Demsmierda]

All Liberals ever learn in life --- is what they hear down at their Local Welfare Office.

 

[angelaq]

Truly, the conservative mentality: when your "proof" is completely fabricated and you have no idea what it is based on, laugh at the people who are asking you for your evidence and call them stupid. Surely that will prove your point. ?°)

 

[Poke_the_Bear]

That is a good point. I just like to see if I can make some people think and others to give me a knee-jerk reaction.

Some can't be bothered to make the effort. Although, I will say if you want a better response to occasionally make your point with a link. Then if you do that, however, they will claim you shouldn't get your info only from FOX News (in my case, my link was from a CNN post). They rarely read anwyay. Not all of them, of course, but the some who are more vitriolic in their opinions.

 

[Dave87gn]

Liberals and conservatives NEVER argue

Conservatives make stuff up, then say they are against it, and liberal point out that the thing they hate is made up- like socialism, death panels, tax increases, kenyan births, etc

 

[IanL]

Its just so hard to resist arguing with these folks, although it is actually wasted effort used on people who will not stop drinking the Koolaide.

 

[david]

eh? what are you talking about? :s

 

[aimjeezy]

"Liberals lower IQ only allows them to post fairy tails and lies"

"To prove my point some Liberals will say in response to this question " Wheres the proof, link, something " When a simple internet search would provide them with the proof"

You accuse them of posting "fairy tales and lies", but don't want them to ask you for links.

 

[CurtJ]

I guess I just like beating my head against the unbreakable wall of Liberal idiocy, because I still try to educate them and did have one minor success with one of them a few days ago. No names mentioned, but he did go look at the Congressional voting records for Civil, Voting and Equal Rights and finally realizes WHO the racists and bigots are and it isn't the Republicans (at least not a majority of them)

 

[Republicanforlife]

Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds.
Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.
The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be.
The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.
"The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward," said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey, who was not involved in the study. "It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people -- people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower -- are likely to be the ones to do that."
Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with "unconventional" philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be "ways to communicate to everyone that you're pretty smart," he said.
The study looked at a large sample from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), which began with adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-95 school year. The participants were interviewed as 18- to 28-year-olds from 2001 to 2002. The study also looked at the General Social Survey, another cross-national data collection source.
Kanazawa did not find that higher or lower intelligence predicted sexual exclusivity in women. This makes sense, because having one partner has always been advantageous to women, even thousands of years ago, meaning exclusivity is not a "new" preference.
For men, on the other hand, sexual exclusivity goes against the grain evolutionarily. With a goal of spreading genes, early men had multiple mates. Since women had to spend nine months being pregnant, and additional years caring for very young children, it made sense for them to want a steady mate to provide them resources.
Religion, the current theory goes, did not help people survive or reproduce necessarily, but goes along the lines of helping people to be paranoid, Kanazawa said. Assuming that, for example, a noise in the distance is a signal of a threat helped early humans to prepare in case of danger.
"It helps life to be paranoid, and because humans are paranoid, they become more religious, and they see the hands of God everywhere," Kanazawa said.
Participants who said they were atheists had an average IQ of 103 in adolescence, while adults who said they were religious averaged 97, the study found. Atheism "allows someone to move forward and speculate on life without any concern for the dogmatic structure of a religion," Bailey said.
"Historically, anything that's new and different can be seen as a threat in terms of the religious beliefs; almost all religious systems are about permanence," he noted.
The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines "liberal" in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people. It does not look at other factors that play into American political beliefs, such as abortion, gun control and gay rights.
"Liberals are more likely to be concerned about total strangers; conservatives are likely to be concerned with people they associate with," he said.
Given that human ancestors had a keen interest in the survival of their offspring and nearest kin, the conservative approach -- looking out for the people around you first -- fits with the evolutionary picture more than liberalism, Kanazawa said. "It's unnatural for humans to be concerned about total strangers." he said.
The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106.
It also makes sense that "conservatism" as a worldview of keeping things stable would be a safer approach than venturing toward the unfamiliar, Bailey said.
Neither Bailey nor Kanazawa identify themselves as liberal; Bailey is conservative and Kanazawa is "a strong libertarian."
Vegetarianism, while not strongly associated with IQ in this study, has been sho

 

[originalbadguy2000]

I hope not. Us Centrists need the entertainment.

 

[wishyouwerehere]

Only when liberals bow down to conservatives and tell them this country is all yours. Do what you will. We all know that will never happen until hell freezes over, as coservatives live in an unrealistic parellel world and what they consider the truth, is nothing but fabricated lies.

So to answer your question, never.

As far as our IQ's go, all the liberals I know are professional people. Doctors, Attorneys, Nurses, Teachers, you know, people who are intelligent and really contribute a great service to the people of our country, so your fairy tale, lies and like arguing with a second grader is as you say pointless.

I wonder what the IQ's are of people in rural Republican areas who work in Wal-Mart, Coal Mines, the dime store, the corner grocery and so on? I doubt your IQ is anything to bragg about and would love to know the type of work you do. I won't ask fot a link. I don't need one to answer a rant like this.