which car is better to have , honda civic 2002 or mitsubishi lancer 2004?
The 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is a very nice car, it was reliable, good handling, good looking vehicle. The 2002 Honda Civic, although reliable, Customizable and good handling, it isn't as good looking as the Mitsubishi. If they are both the same price then I'd go for the Mitsubishi, because its just as reliable, it is better looking and overall I'd like to have it and be looking at it in my driveway.
Thanks
-Steves
Thanks
-Steves
fuzzy
Member
first of all, honda civic and mitsubishi lancer arent the same price, mitsubishi is around 2000 more.
but mitsubishi lancer is way way way better in all aspects that you need for a good car. its a smooth car that takes less gas then alot of other cars, and its also one of the top "tuner" cars in the world.
but mitsubishi lancer is way way way better in all aspects that you need for a good car. its a smooth car that takes less gas then alot of other cars, and its also one of the top "tuner" cars in the world.
fuzzy
Member
first of all, honda civic and mitsubishi lancer arent the same price, mitsubishi is around 2000 more.
but mitsubishi lancer is way way way better in all aspects that you need for a good car. its a smooth car that takes less gas then alot of other cars, and its also one of the top "tuner" cars in the world.
but mitsubishi lancer is way way way better in all aspects that you need for a good car. its a smooth car that takes less gas then alot of other cars, and its also one of the top "tuner" cars in the world.
hellra1ser
New member
Honda Civics have gone down in quality since the late 90s, probably to keep the price down despite inflation, so the legendary reliability you hear about them is old news. Lancers have never really been a good value. Civics are a bit better on gas. Hondas in general are easy to break into since criminals know them very well since they're more popular, but the Lancer has rally car styling which may be more appealing to some.
Which has less mileage? Which has more features? A/C, power windows, locks, air bags, anti lock braking, power steering, etc. What kind of condition? What color? What look do you prefer? You'd may be surprised that some cars don't come with A/C standard, like the Hyundai Elantra.
I'd think the Lancer is more of a chick magnet. The Civic will likely take less money to keep running. The Civic also may hold it's value better because of the Civic's reputation (old news, but people don't know better). The Lancer is newer, but I'm suspicious of it being as cheap as the Civic. If they're in similar condition, the Lancer is a better buy.
Which has less mileage? Which has more features? A/C, power windows, locks, air bags, anti lock braking, power steering, etc. What kind of condition? What color? What look do you prefer? You'd may be surprised that some cars don't come with A/C standard, like the Hyundai Elantra.
I'd think the Lancer is more of a chick magnet. The Civic will likely take less money to keep running. The Civic also may hold it's value better because of the Civic's reputation (old news, but people don't know better). The Lancer is newer, but I'm suspicious of it being as cheap as the Civic. If they're in similar condition, the Lancer is a better buy.