monkormonkey
New member
- Mar 15, 2010
- 2
- 0
- 1
I was just wondering what game you think is better.
I own both games and i personally like Bad Company 2 alot more. I think MW2 has gotten better reviews because it has a better campaign and also has spec ops. I think that the multiplayer in BC2 rapes MW2 though.
IMO BC2 is better (multiplayer only, but hey that's all anyone does anyway)
Here's why and why not i think its better that CoD.
Why:
Better graphics
Bigger maps
Much more explosions and stuff going on; warlike.
Destructibe environments
Can get in vehicles
No campers
No lag (because of DEDICATED SERVERS)
Why not:
On rush, you can spawn kill so easy it's not funny.
Not as many game modes
EA sucks balls
Only has 10 maps and even worse, only about 4 for each game mode
All i can think of for now.........so yeah.......
I own both games and i personally like Bad Company 2 alot more. I think MW2 has gotten better reviews because it has a better campaign and also has spec ops. I think that the multiplayer in BC2 rapes MW2 though.
IMO BC2 is better (multiplayer only, but hey that's all anyone does anyway)
Here's why and why not i think its better that CoD.
Why:
Better graphics
Bigger maps
Much more explosions and stuff going on; warlike.
Destructibe environments
Can get in vehicles
No campers
No lag (because of DEDICATED SERVERS)
Why not:
On rush, you can spawn kill so easy it's not funny.
Not as many game modes
EA sucks balls
Only has 10 maps and even worse, only about 4 for each game mode
All i can think of for now.........so yeah.......