Why is it easy for the average person to dismiss an alternate theory to

[Jasonz1]

government propaganda as a conspiracy? Things like the 9/11 attacks, I personaly have studied the events and the obvious conclusion to anyone who can see past the void of government propaganda, is that
1.the U.S government was intimately involved, as were Israel and even pakistani ISI
2.The towers were brought down by controlled demolition
3.The U.S government is actively covering it up
4. history has shown that governments (including this one)have used government sponsored 'false flags' to push the agendas of the ruling elite or oligarchs.Which we can see 9/11 has been used as a pretext for preemptive wars, degradation of the U.S constitution, bill of rights and the individual liberty of the american people.The 9/11 attacks gave power to the government and took it from the people.

Hitler did the same thing and staged false flags to destroy the german peoples liberty and launch preemptive wars.This is seen throughout all history.But somehow today modern day propaganda has brainwashed the average person into thinking it is not possible for such a scale of government corruption to exist.
'mrjoness' look up the 2000 PNAC documents where they call for 'pearl harbor like events' to expand U.S empire.
I'd like to see where it's been “debunked” because NIST and popular mechanics have been debunked for the propagandist that they are.
Yes Bob S it is.I really feel sorry for the sheeple answering on here, they may forever be lost in the void of government propaganda and blind to truth.
Ignorance is strengh to them
and lies are truth to them.
They will not question their reality.
Yes “Obama christ” you and your buddy are pawns of the false ‘left right‘ control grid.
“collete” you have no argument, thus you result to insults and claim i'm on drugs.You are pathetic and a sheep.Why do enjoy being conned and duped?
History and reality are obviously oblivious to you.

 

[ellejaeMUAHt]

This is flatly untrue. There are many examples of government projects that involved thousands of people who did not speak out, including the Manhattan Project.
Even if taken at face value, the people who attempt to blow the whistle usually do so because the government was unable to cover up its activities, but are often silenced or ignored by the media. The people who do take them seriously are usually marginalised and discredited on grounds of other myths, such as the one holding that whistleblowers would be killed by the government (Myth #18). The result is that of a circular logic loop that makes real questions impossible.
This claim is also based on a misconception regarding the possible actors in a conspiracy: incompetent politicians and bureaucrats are very different from highly trained military intel and determined corporations.
Contrarily to popular beliefs, conspiracy theorists do not view the government as an omnipotent, omnipresent and infallible entity. In fact, a lot of their evidence comes from slip-ups or failures by elites to cover up their crimes, but people refuse to believe it because they are conditioned into the circular belief that the same evidence being exposed to the public would have been exposed to the public.
Even in the event that some of the cover-up falls apart, governments exercise damage control in order to allow only part of the conspiracy to be exposed. For example, the fact the so many people now believe there was a 9-11 conspiracy is evidence that any cover-up has not been completely successful. To say that the government could not be involved because no whistleblowers have come forward to admit involvement is essentially flawed in two distinct ways:
Firstly, it assumes that any guilty parties would incriminate themselves, something that is ludicrous to assume, knowing the penalty for treason (see Myth #38).
Secondly, a false dichotomy is erected, stating that, without whistleblowers and leaks, the cover