...over their decisions? Ann Curry on Nadya Suleman, Jim Grey on Pete Rose. I mean come on, the reporters are looking down their noses on people who became newsworthy due to their limited mental capacity and the results from miscalculated decision, not because they are fighting to be in the news.
Are these reporters in any position to judge? Does covering games for a living or doing fluff pieces about pregnancies really add more than a trivial distraction to people's life? It's not like the reporters are changing the world with what they are doing.
Nadya Suleman wanted kids, Pete Rose was great on the baseball diamond, neither ever claimed to be experts on anything else in life or self promote themselves as an example to follow. Serious news deserves serious scrutiny. Give incidental news makers a break.
Are these reporters in any position to judge? Does covering games for a living or doing fluff pieces about pregnancies really add more than a trivial distraction to people's life? It's not like the reporters are changing the world with what they are doing.
Nadya Suleman wanted kids, Pete Rose was great on the baseball diamond, neither ever claimed to be experts on anything else in life or self promote themselves as an example to follow. Serious news deserves serious scrutiny. Give incidental news makers a break.