...premarital sex or who rape women? I am anti-abortion from conception to birth but I think that in most cases of abortion it is not the woman's fault but the fault of the man who originally impregnated her. Studies continually show that over 80% of abortions result from men having premarital sex with a woman and the remaining 20% of abortions that result from sex within a married couple are clearly cases of husband rape because if the married woman later got an abortion she clearly did not want to have sex at the time.
I also think this would be a good idea because current methods of castration are not what you think they are (i.e. taken a knife a shearing off the genitalia)-they are usually low cost chemical procedures so they are in accordance with human rights (I know that men would not want this-but that is the point-- a deterrent strong enough to keep men away from women until they are ready to have a child and would not abort it).
I think that men who convince a woman to have premarital sex or even worse, who rape a woman, clearly have surrendered their rights to having any more sex ever. If you still aren't convinced, look on the bright side: this policy would pay wondrous dividends, for there would be a lot more eunuchs in society which would mean less aggression and less violence. Look in the animal world: which animals are more productive? Geldings (castrated horses) or stallions? Oxen or bulls? A wether (castrated sheep) or a ram? In all cases, the castrated males provide way more service to the owners then the uncastrated ones. The only negative aspect is that they can't reproduce but you only need a small amount of males to maintain the population and this goes for humans too.
In fact, I am so enamored by this proposal that I am surprised it has not ever been thought of before. Why can't people take a look at what farmers do in agriculture (the first and most basic of occupations) and learn from that and apply those lessons to humanity?
I also think this would be a good idea because current methods of castration are not what you think they are (i.e. taken a knife a shearing off the genitalia)-they are usually low cost chemical procedures so they are in accordance with human rights (I know that men would not want this-but that is the point-- a deterrent strong enough to keep men away from women until they are ready to have a child and would not abort it).
I think that men who convince a woman to have premarital sex or even worse, who rape a woman, clearly have surrendered their rights to having any more sex ever. If you still aren't convinced, look on the bright side: this policy would pay wondrous dividends, for there would be a lot more eunuchs in society which would mean less aggression and less violence. Look in the animal world: which animals are more productive? Geldings (castrated horses) or stallions? Oxen or bulls? A wether (castrated sheep) or a ram? In all cases, the castrated males provide way more service to the owners then the uncastrated ones. The only negative aspect is that they can't reproduce but you only need a small amount of males to maintain the population and this goes for humans too.
In fact, I am so enamored by this proposal that I am surprised it has not ever been thought of before. Why can't people take a look at what farmers do in agriculture (the first and most basic of occupations) and learn from that and apply those lessons to humanity?