...not research your interest? I guess a better question would be
"Why propose arguments against
something you don't understand?"
Why not research the argument?
I usually address questions about species
diversity, Abiogenesis, and The Big Bang.
I usually see the same questions repeated
with the same refrain as if someone is telling
people the arguments against without giving
them any explanation at all.
"If evolution.... then why is the universe..."
"If evolution.... then why are the stars..."
"If Big bang.... then how come monkeys..."
Do you have a functional understanding of Abiogenesis,
and The Big Bang? What is your argument against it?
"Why propose arguments against
something you don't understand?"
Why not research the argument?
I usually address questions about species
diversity, Abiogenesis, and The Big Bang.
I usually see the same questions repeated
with the same refrain as if someone is telling
people the arguments against without giving
them any explanation at all.
"If evolution.... then why is the universe..."
"If evolution.... then why are the stars..."
"If Big bang.... then how come monkeys..."
Do you have a functional understanding of Abiogenesis,
and The Big Bang? What is your argument against it?