If Obama had a choice between Unions & the lives of little kids like the

Jewelh

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
ones he screwed out of vouchers in DC? who would he choose?

Of course we know he went with the spend more money (vouchers were saving about 45% of the cost over public education) and against the kids for the bloated corrupt Unions with the horrible dangerous schools witch were also very ineffective in teaching. Pretty much ruined the kids lives who'd been pulled out of that dangerous substandard Union Public School Hell and put in good schools where they were thriving then got pulled back into that hell because Obama had to pander to the Greedy Corrupt money sucking Unions and their nasty scum pots called DC public schools. They are among the most dangerous and least effective in the Nation, and cost the most money.

What does that tell you about Obama's priorities? Unions over kids? What does that tell you about Unions? They see kids as live stock to justify their ripping off the tax payers. What does it say about a Federal Dept of Education? We would be better off without ALL OF THEM. For Gods sake, can't we even cut kids a break from all the political garbage stinking up the country?

Obviously not, these people need to get tossed out on their heads and they can make their way in private life without our tax dollars. Maybe that would help them to recover from the corrupt rotten pieces of human garbage that they are now.

Get the Parasites OFF OF OUR MONEY!
Hawkeye, your problem is you're stupid, obviously lol. Don't assume things when you're this stupid, it won't work out for you.

Public Unions who work to get more for less & the teachers that are part of them are parasitic, because it can be done much better for less. Vouchers always work, they've never failed to improve the educational lot of the kids who get them.
Jimmy, if you watched fox instead of just the Parasites Pravda about Fox, you'd be a hell of a lot better informed.
 
Back
Top