their own benefit? OK, so... I'm atheist but from what I understand after reading through all the R&S section, it appears to me that the Christian religions are worshiping against their own benefit in the long run? Apparently, the Christians aren't supposed to lust since it's a sin, right? This doesn't make sense to me: if humanity didn't permanently lust for the other gender, there wouldn't be any descendants to perpetuate the Christian religion! So God should actually be happy that people "sin" all the time by lusting and having sex and making babies. That's something I always wondered. So in other words: no lust=no sex, no sex=no descendants, no descendants=death of the religion... Or did I miss anything and is lust OK in certain circumstances or what?
So, Loveflowerh, what you're telling me is that, for a Christian, the only way to have sex without sinning is basically to be raped??? That religion has very interesting values!
So, Loveflowerh, what you're telling me is that, for a Christian, the only way to have sex without sinning is basically to be raped??? That religion has very interesting values!