Poll: To the people who still believe in a 911 conspiracy, have you read

S

sciencectn

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
the following links? This is just a poll out of curiosity. I don't have an opinion in this matter, but I'm just curious to see who has seen the other side of the story and still believes in a conspiracy. I am not trying to assert my opinion on you in any way.

The websites are:
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
 
Uh you do realize Popular Mechanics is paid propaganda right?

Here is proof of hundreds of Architects and Engineers who dont support the official story:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

And Richard Gage is one of them. Here is an interesting series which many sheep should watch if they still believe in the the ridiculous official story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW6Oez7pag0

Popular Mechanics and NIST couldn't even refute many claims including the most damming evidence - the presence of MOLTEN STEEL identified by firefighters, engineers and Controlled Demolition as shown in this video:

http://www.livevideo.com/video/690AB7EDCAD4441AA2F39299FD87017C/9-11-molten-steel.aspx

When confronted with the Molten Steel argument Popular Mechanics and NIST deny there was so Molten steel at all! Because if they accepted the presence of Molten Steel they that would mean Thermite was used to bring those three towers down. NIST, Popular Mechanics and other debunking sites now say it was Aluminum from the planes! But the Molten Steel was glowing orange and unfortunately for them under the laws of physics Aluminum will always stay silver regardless of temperature. In fact if you want proof showing Aluminium stays silvery then refer to the Richard Gage video.
 
What I've read from both sites is chock full of assumptions, which kind of puts them on par with the conspiracy theories themselves.

Example: "...pretend thermite can burn sideways to melt vertical columns. Maybe with some device but no working device has been proven to me to work. While there are relatively large canisters which can burn small holes sideways, I have yet to see this elusive steel cutting technique used to cut a vertical column."

Who is this guy? The fact that nothing has been shown to HIM means the whole thing is debunked? That's pretty faulty logic.

Nothing written there addresses the fact that burning jet fuel and office equipment doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, or whatever other type of metal it was that was pouring out of the corner of the tower.
 
Back
Top