Ok, so the proof that Jesus is the Messiah is that, according to the New Testament, He fulfilled all the messianic prophecies, right?
Well, this time of the year has got me thinking about the Christmas story. The Gospel of Matthew gives the genealogy of Jesus, and says he is descended from King David. This is one of the messianic prophecies, being in the line of King David. One minor issue: the line of David runs through Joseph not Mary. Joseph is not Jesus real father, so his bloodline does not run through Jesus. So how is Jesus related to king David, and if he isn't doesn't that mean he didn't fulfill one of the messianic prophecies, ergo he is not the true Messiah?
@Devoted- You say both Mary and Joseph are descended from King David, where are you finding that information? Matthew is the only gospel that mentions the genealogy of Jesus and it only accounts of Joseph being related to David. Which makes sense, as the Jews did heritage through the father not the mother. And supposedly Jesus does not have an earthly father.
djmantx- so what you are saying is that it is a prophecy that can't literally be fulfilled so it is to be accepted as fulfilled anyway?
Doesn't sound that logical.
I am looking for thoughts on the matter that are logical, and actually make some sense like many of the answers given. Please don't try to feed me this "My ways are not your ways" line you would give o kids in your youth group. If the prophecy can not literally be fulfilled, then it is wrong. Period. What is the point of "God" outlining prophecies then just rejecting them as not important becuase they can't be fulfilled without making Him wrong?
Also, the born to a virgin prophecy has a lot to do with what translation is used for "virgin."
Well, this time of the year has got me thinking about the Christmas story. The Gospel of Matthew gives the genealogy of Jesus, and says he is descended from King David. This is one of the messianic prophecies, being in the line of King David. One minor issue: the line of David runs through Joseph not Mary. Joseph is not Jesus real father, so his bloodline does not run through Jesus. So how is Jesus related to king David, and if he isn't doesn't that mean he didn't fulfill one of the messianic prophecies, ergo he is not the true Messiah?
@Devoted- You say both Mary and Joseph are descended from King David, where are you finding that information? Matthew is the only gospel that mentions the genealogy of Jesus and it only accounts of Joseph being related to David. Which makes sense, as the Jews did heritage through the father not the mother. And supposedly Jesus does not have an earthly father.
djmantx- so what you are saying is that it is a prophecy that can't literally be fulfilled so it is to be accepted as fulfilled anyway?
Doesn't sound that logical.
I am looking for thoughts on the matter that are logical, and actually make some sense like many of the answers given. Please don't try to feed me this "My ways are not your ways" line you would give o kids in your youth group. If the prophecy can not literally be fulfilled, then it is wrong. Period. What is the point of "God" outlining prophecies then just rejecting them as not important becuase they can't be fulfilled without making Him wrong?
Also, the born to a virgin prophecy has a lot to do with what translation is used for "virgin."