I will concede your right to your opinion on the acting talents of Morgan Freeman but only if you will concede my right to the exact opposite of it. After all, how else should two gentleman opt to disagree?
Morgan's penchant for picking good scripts and not overacting a part are two of his appeals for me. Granted he is the father/grandfather advisor in each of his efforts, but that is as I wish it. He offers a stable center in which others may play. His body of work speaks for itself in an impressive manner and who knows the depth and breadth of his behind the camera contributions. They must certainly be impressive considering how loyal Hollywood's moguls are to this actor who holds such an appeal to the American public that disagrees with your assessment. He is one of Hollywood's most bankable stars and rightfully so.
Having said all of that I will also relate that another actor whose films I refuse to miss is Sir Anthony Hopkins. Both Hopkins and Morgan will survive our opinions with much more alacrity in having such opinion stated of them than we will in giving them, I'm sure. But isn't it fun that they can even inspire you and I to disagree with their talent?
"If you can bear with fame and fortune and treat both those imposters just the same"