Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the idea that terrorists etc represent muslims is something of a red herring. Apart from organisations where there is a nominated head, there isn't a representative or group of representatives.
However, the terrorists are examples of muslims. In a system made up of individuals, we can look at examples and draw inferences about the behaviour of the system.
Every muslim who donates to charity and lives lawfully is an example of a muslim. Every muslim who beats his daughter for driving in a car with a man or rampages in the streets because of a cartoon is also an example of a muslim.
The key question is whether, looking at the system as a whole, Islam contains enough examples of extreme behaviour (or extreme behaviour in sufficient magnitude) as compared to other idiological groups to be considered problematic in itself. If you look at it this way, individual examples don't make much difference. The odd muslim nutter or the odd christian nutter or the odd atheist nutter don't tell you much about the system.
The important question is whether there is a critical mass of examples occurring within one group. Are you more likely to launch into religiously motivated crime if you belong to one group rather than another?